1949 Bristol 450 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 450. (154 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 450.
Because 1949 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Bristol 450 | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 450 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1949 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 61 L |