1949 Bristol 450 vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 5,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (653 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 499 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 450. (154 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1949 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Bristol 450 | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 450 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 653 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 105 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4778 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2035 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1425 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 61 L |
