1949 Buick 40 vs. 1951 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1951 Cadillac 62 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 57 kg more than 1949 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 1951 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | 62 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 5422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 96.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 92.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1752 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3210 mm |