1949 Buick 40 vs. 1952 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 1952 Hudson Hornet is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Hudson Hornet (144 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 155 kg more than 1949 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 1952 Hudson Hornet | |
Make | Buick | Hudson |
Model | 40 | Hornet |
Year Released | 1949 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4810 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2990 mm |