1949 Buick 40 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1958 Cadillac 62 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1949 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Buick 40 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | 40 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 5979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 2195 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3300 mm |
