1949 Buick 40 vs. 1972 Volvo 164
To start off, 1972 Volvo 164 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Volvo 164 (156 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1972 Volvo 164.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 1972 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | 40 | 164 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1360 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2730 mm |