1949 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 487 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | TS-50 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2760 mm |