1949 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 2000 Seat Alhambra is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 200 kg more than 2000 Seat Alhambra.
Because 1949 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Alhambra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2000 Seat Alhambra | |
Make | Buick | Seat |
Model | 40 | Alhambra |
Year Released | 1949 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 1780 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 86.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1865 kg | 1665 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2850 mm |