1949 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Toyota Solara
To start off, 2000 Toyota Solara is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Solara (133 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Solara should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 315 kg more than 2000 Toyota Solara.
Because 1949 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Solara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2000 Toyota Solara | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | 40 | Solara |
Year Released | 1949 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 90.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1380 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2680 mm |