1949 Buick 40 vs. 2001 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2001 Seat Arosa is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 108 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 356 kg more than 2001 Seat Arosa.
Because 1949 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2001 Seat Arosa | |
Make | Buick | Seat |
Model | 40 | Arosa |
Year Released | 1949 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1289 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2340 mm |