1949 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Audi TT
To start off, 2002 Audi TT is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi TT (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 355 kg more than 2002 Audi TT.
Because 1949 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Buick 40 | 2002 Audi TT | |
| Make | Buick | Audi |
| Model | 40 | TT |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1340 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2430 mm |
