1949 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 100 kg more than 1949 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2003 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1745 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2890 mm |