1949 Buick 40 vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (396 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 50 kg more than 1949 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | CTS |
Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 5665 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 396 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1745 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2890 mm |