1949 Buick 40 vs. 2004 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2004 Lotus Elise is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotus Elise (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 945 kg more than 2004 Lotus Elise.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2004 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Buick | Lotus |
Model | 40 | Elise |
Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 89.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 750 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2310 mm |