1949 Buick 40 vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Buick 40 (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (106 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 555 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Buick 40 | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Buick | Renault |
| Model | 40 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1090 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2480 mm |
