1949 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Stilo (131 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2006 Fiat Stilo.
Because 1949 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2006 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Buick | Fiat |
Model | 40 | Stilo |
Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 82.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1315 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2610 mm |