1949 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (148 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 387 kg more than 2006 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1865 kg | 1478 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2730 mm |