1949 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 114 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 1949 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Buick | Volkswagen |
Model | 40 | Polo |
Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 92.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2470 mm |