1949 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Volvo C70 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo C70 (197 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 38 kg more than 2006 Volvo C70.
Because 1949 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2006 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | 40 | C70 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1657 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2670 mm |