1949 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (300 HP) has 186 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 87 kg more than 1949 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2009 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | STS |
Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 300 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 85.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1782 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2960 mm |