1949 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (148 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 445 kg more than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1865 kg | 1420 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2710 mm |