1949 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Epica (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Epica.
Because 1949 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2010 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | 40 | Epica |
Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1635 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2710 mm |