1949 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 167 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | 40 | UTE |
Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 281 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |