1949 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XF weights approximately 127 kg more than 1949 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Buick 40 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Buick | Jaguar |
| Model | 40 | XF |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1822 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2908 mm |
