1949 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (141 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 221 kg more than 1949 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1866 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3010 mm |