1949 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (212 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 284 kg more than 2010 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Buick 40 | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Buick | Mazda |
| Model | 40 | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1411 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2700 mm |
