1949 Buick 40 vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40.
Because 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Buick 40 | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Buick | Land Rover |
| Model | 40 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4367 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2891 mm |
