1949 Cadillac 62 vs. 1956 Volvo P 1900
To start off, 1956 Volvo P 1900 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 890 kg more than 1956 Volvo P 1900.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Cadillac 62 | 1956 Volvo P 1900 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | P 1900 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 1414 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2610 mm |