1949 Cadillac 62 vs. 1974 Renault 17
To start off, 1974 Renault 17 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 695 kg more than 1974 Renault 17.
Because 1949 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Renault 17, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Cadillac 62 | 1974 Renault 17 | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | 62 | 17 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 1606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2440 mm |