1949 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 1996 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1996 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 1949 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Chrysler Sebring | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | 62 | Sebring |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
