1949 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 200 kg more than 1949 Cadillac 62.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 62 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2730 mm |
