1949 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1999 Renault Zo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Renault Zo | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | 62 | Zo |
Year Released | 1949 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2580 mm |