1949 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2000 Toyota Corolla is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 610 kg more than 2000 Toyota Corolla.
Because 2000 Toyota Corolla is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Corolla will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | Corolla |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 103 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2730 mm |
