1949 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | 62 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 222 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2550 mm |
