1949 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Mahindra Scorpio
To start off, 2003 Mahindra Scorpio is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra Scorpio weights approximately 160 kg more than 1949 Cadillac 62.
Because 2003 Mahindra Scorpio is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Scorpio will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Mahindra Scorpio | |
Make | Cadillac | Mahindra |
Model | 62 | Scorpio |
Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 2609 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2690 mm |