1949 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 565 kg more than 2006 Toyota 4Runner.
Because 2006 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 236 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2800 mm |
