1949 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2010 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 849 kg more than 1949 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 2599 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2027 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3099 mm |