1949 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 BMW X5 M
To start off, 2013 BMW X5 M is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X5 M weights approximately 685 kg more than 1949 Cadillac 62.
Because 2013 BMW X5 M is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 M will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Cadillac 62 | 2013 BMW X5 M | |
| Make | Cadillac | BMW |
| Model | 62 | X5 M |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 4395 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 547 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 2435 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2197 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2933 mm |
