1949 Chevrolet 2103 vs. 1960 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1960 Ford Zodiac is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Chevrolet 2103. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Chevrolet 2103 would be higher. At 3,548 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Chevrolet 2103 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Chevrolet 2103 (90 HP @ 3300 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Chevrolet 2103 should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Chevrolet 2103 weights approximately 299 kg more than 1960 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Chevrolet 2103 | 1960 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | 2103 | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3548 cc | 2552 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.2 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1191 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2720 mm |
