1949 Chevrolet 2103 vs. 1974 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1974 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Chevrolet 2103. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Chevrolet 2103 would be higher. At 3,548 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Chevrolet 2103 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-2 (119 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. (90 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Chevrolet 2103 weights approximately 530 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Chevrolet 2103 | 1974 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | 2103 | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3548 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2480 mm |
