1949 Chevrolet 2103 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Chevrolet 2103. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Chevrolet 2103 would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. (90 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 2 kg more than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Chevrolet 2103 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | 2103 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3548 cc | 3801 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.2 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1492 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2580 mm |
