1949 Chevrolet 2103 vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Chevrolet 2103. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Chevrolet 2103 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-150 (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. (90 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-150 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Chevrolet 2103 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Chevrolet 2103. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Chevrolet 2103 | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | 2103 | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3548 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4717 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1925 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2824 mm |
