1949 Chevrolet 2103 vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Chevrolet 2103. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Chevrolet 2103 would be higher. At 3,548 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Chevrolet 2103 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC60 (281 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. (90 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 403 kg more than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Chevrolet 2103 | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | 2103 | XC60 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3548 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1893 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2774 mm |