1949 Chevrolet 2103 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Chevrolet 2103. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Chevrolet 2103 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (306 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. (90 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 816 kg more than 1949 Chevrolet 2103. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Chevrolet 2103 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | 2103 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3548 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.2 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 2306 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3700 mm |