1949 Citroen 11 vs. 1972 Volvo 1800
To start off, 1972 Volvo 1800 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Volvo 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Volvo 1800 (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1949 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Volvo 1800 should accelerate faster than 1949 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Volvo 1800 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1949 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Volvo 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Volvo 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Citroen 11 | 1972 Volvo 1800 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 11 | 1800 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2460 mm |