1949 Citroen 11 vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Citroen 11 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste (74 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1949 Citroen 11. (55 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1949 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Citroen 11 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Citroen 11 | 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 11 | Celeste |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1410 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2350 mm |
