1949 Citroen 11 vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma (98 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1949 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1949 Citroen 11.
Because 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Citroen 11 | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | 11 | Sigma |
Year Released | 1949 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2520 mm |