1949 Citroen 11 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1949 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1949 Citroen 11.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Citroen 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Citroen 11 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 11 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 4016 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 206 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 3010 mm |
