1949 Fiat 1500 vs. 1990 Ford RS 200
To start off, 1990 Ford RS 200 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Fiat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Fiat 1500 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1949 Fiat 1500. (47 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1949 Fiat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Fiat 1500 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1990 Ford RS 200.
Because 1990 Ford RS 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Fiat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Fiat 1500 | 1990 Ford RS 200 | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1500 | RS 200 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1990 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 77.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 54 L |