1949 Fiat 500 vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (395 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 379 more horse power than 1949 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1949 Fiat 500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1949 Fiat 500 has manual transmission. 1949 Fiat 500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Fiat 500 | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 500 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 569 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 395 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3250 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 55 L |